Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 06:48

What’s next?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Country music star suffers onstage medical event, hospitalized - AL.com
Thank you.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Asia-Pacific markets trade mixed as investors assess Trump claims of 'done' deal with China - CNBC
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Missing link star? Why this 'teenage vampire' white dwarf has scientists so excited - Space
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Why do a lot of autistic people not know how to style their hair?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Roundup: All The Xbox Reveals From Summer Game Fest 2025 - Pure Xbox